Feminists have been incredibly successful at banning words like whore and slut. But banning the label doesn’t ban the reality, and therefore the idea. As a result, new labels have popped up that circumvent the SJW shaming police. These new terms are derivatives of the banned terms, and have an element of humor that strikes at the heart of the SJW scold. THOT is an acronym, meaning:
- That
- Ho (whore)
- Over
- There
But the real meaning is just ho, or whore. It is slut shaming with a built in smirk. Likewise the words slooty and sloot. They are a funny take on slut, and therefore can effectively sneak past the thought police. Eventually these terms themselves will become unspeakable. But once that happens, newer and funnier words for whore and slut will mischievously find their way into the vernacular.
Personally, am fond of the good ole standby, “slore” -‘(slut/whore). It just feels moral and right escaping a man’s lips in the appropriate situation.
Same problem with Blacks. They keep changing their name but because the people never change every new name becomes a perjorative.
The acronym you’ve put up is also a sign that men – particularly young ones – are awake to the whole game. They are looking at women’s nature and the way they act.
They are not taking on what women say about themselves or what their SJW cohorts say, and they are labelling accordingly. Even worse, they are judging accordingly.
So much for the Men’s Movement being a disparate group of ageing, basement-dwelling misfits.
Same here .. but I pronounce it .. “SLURE” .. same combo .. just dif spelling.
Bans only work if you allow them to.
Call ‘em like ya see ‘em.
A little off-topic, but I saw a video on youtube about a traditional Pacific Islander language which embodies this concept. Its traditional to name people using common, everyday words. But its also strictly taboo to ever say the name of a dead person. So every time someone dies, some new euphemisms for common words needs to be devised.
Take a page out of other clever SJW workarounds: start using one of their terms that they hold dear to mean something negative (which usually isn’t a problem, as it’s already negative most of the time). I vote for “feminist”.
Today I found out what THOT means. I have heard and seen it around, and by implication understood the meaning. But now I am fully up to speed. Thanks Dalrock.
I still prefer ‘slut’.
As the protesters said in the movie “Luther” as the papists were burning his books. “You can burn his books, but you can’t burn his ideas!”
Eventually workarounds may not be enough and everyone living in the USA with any sense will make some popcorn.
https://www.flagusa.org/patriotismreport/
According to the linked survey:
Half of those surveyed believe the United States is sexist (50%) and racist (49%);
American exceptionalism is on the decline. 46% of younger Americans do not agree that “America is the greatest country in the world”;
38% of younger Americans do not agree that “America has a history that we should be proud of”;
One in eight (14%) of Millennials agree that “America was never a great country and it never will be”;
46% of younger Americans agree that “America is more racist than other countries”;
84% of Americans do not know the specific rights enumerated in the First Amendment;
19% of Millennials believe that the American flag is “a sign of intolerance and hatred”;
44% of younger Americans believe Barack Obama had a “bigger impact” on America than George Washington
Seems a natural progression from feminism/Duluth/fathers ejected from the home/BabyMomma Smartphone Parenting, Inc.
@KnobSlobRob
Personally, am fond of the good ole standby, “slore” -‘(slut/whore). It just feels moral and right escaping a man’s lips in the appropriate situation.
Plus, if Dalrock’s prediction comes true for this word and a girl tries to report you for uttering it then you can always beat the rap by saying, “Hey, I don’t know what you’re so upset about. I was just making a reference to Ghostbusters!”
Yet another cat lady, age 50, laments never getting married. On the Dennis Prager Show: https://www.dennisprager.com/a-message-to-young-women-from-a-career-woman/
“I’m 50 years old with four college degrees. I was raised by a feminist mother with no father in the home. My mother told me get an education to the maximum level so that you can get out in the world, make a lot of money. And that’s the path I followed. I make adequate money. I don’t make a ton of money. But I do make enough to support my own household.
“I want to tell women in their 20s: Do not follow the path that I followed. You are leading yourself to a life of loneliness. All of your friends will be getting married and having children, and you’re working to compete in the world, and what you’re doing is competing with men. Men don’t like competitors. Men want a partner. It took me until my late 40s to realize this.
“And by the time you have your own household with all your own bills, you can’t get off that track, because now you’ve got to make the money to pay your bills. It’s hard to find a partner in your late 40s to date because you also start losing self-confidence about your looks, your body. It’s not the same as it was in your 20s.
“You try to do what you can to make your life fulfilling. I have cats and dogs. But it’s lonely when you see your friends having children, going on vacations, planning the lives of their children, and you don’t do anything at night but come home to your cats and dogs. I don’t want other women to do what I have done.”
RPL
Yet another cat lady, age 50, laments never getting married. On the Dennis Prager Show
So?
Well as expected a modern womminz (25 years old) had a harsh response for ol’ DP ..
https://theothermccain.com/2018/11/29/national-reviews-pro-family-writer-xan_desanctis-insults-dennis-prager/
Her meltdown is broke-down above.
I realize we have moved on from #MeToo to Sloots.
But this article was published today.
Well, now things are getting just ridiculous!
Actually, not really. Not at all.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulhsieh/2018/11/29/could-metoo-hurt-womens-health-care/#da003f65e85c
Unfortunately, their hormones will take over once in their late teens to 20s. Then they will turn blue pill
So is this where we have all arrived, thanks to #metoo?:
“I will not meet alone with a woman. Door will be open. Camera will be on. And/or I will have a buddy with me.”
“I will not travel alone with a woman or dine alone with a woman or social with women, even during work hours or for work-related entertainment purposes.”
“I will not go within 3 feet of a woman’s personal space.”
“I will not help women.”
“I will not hire women.”
“I will not talk or approach women.”
“I will not ask a woman out for a date because I may be below her SMV and therefore automatically a ‘sexual harasser’.”
“I will let women die before I give her CPR.”
It’s one thing to look upon this train of unintended consequences from a male’s perspective.
But gazing upon these attitudes from the perspective of my mother, sisters, nieces, and female colleagues, this becomes a very different (indifferent) world. And I’m convinced that they are largely clueless as to the extent.
Slatten works too.
The yahoo police keep deleting all my comments on their stories whenever I use the term “home-wrecker.” That word is apparently, taboo to feminism.
Pingback: THOTs are slooty. | Reaction Times
Speaking of THOT’s, Pastor Bolz-Weber naughty hijinks continue…
“Liberal Lutheran pastor and author Nadia Bolz-Weber has encouraged women to send her their purity rings to be melted down and recast into a golden vagina in protest of evangelical purity culture.
“This thing about women that the church has tried to hide and control and that is a canvas on which other people can write their own righteousness ― it’s actually ours,” Bolz-Weber told HuffPost. “This part of me is mine and I get to determine what is good for it and if it’s beautiful and how I use it in the world.””
https://www.christianpost.com/news/liberal-lutheran-pastor-to-melt-purity-rings-into-vagina-sculpture-to-take-down-church-teachings-about-sex.html
Article from Red Pill Latecomer said:
>It’s hard to find a partner in your late 40s to date because you also start losing self-confidence about your looks, your body.
On the one hand, this woman is to be strongly commended for no only seeing how her own choices led to a bad result, but for even trying to help other women avoid the same.
But the statement quoted above shows she is still not completely honest with herself. In her late 40s the problem was not the lack of confidence about her look. It was the departure thereof, about 20 years prior.
Understand something people…cunts can say anything they want about a man and you’re supposed to take it. You’re not allowed to criticize them in any way. This is where we are now. Put the cunts in their place very harshly by LAW or they will destroy all your freedoms and country. Rule over them with a rod of iron or they’ll do it to you. It doesn’t work any other way. This is not rocket science.
She had all the time in the world to figure it out but choose not to UNTIL it came up behind her and bit her in the ass. So many morons always wait until it affects them PERSONALLY. So no sympathy from me.
If you’re going to worship it, you might as well make a proper idol…
I just looked at a profile on a dating site. This woman was griping about all the men hitting her up for sex, yet most of her pics are showing significant cleavage, one in front of a bed. She failed to see the idiocy.
Treat her like a lady, but she is going to pose like a slut.
Who wants a partner? I want a helpmeet. I am not likely to get one, but that is all I would be drawn to. (Hard to figure it out ahead of time today unfortunately.)
I just looked at a profile on a dating site. This woman was griping about all the men hitting her up for sex, yet most of her pics are showing significant cleavage, one in front of a bed. She failed to see the idiocy.
Treat her like a lady, but she is going to pose like a slut.
PLEASE tell us that you’re not seriously shocked that a woman can’t connect cause and effect…
@BillyS
I interned at a DA’s office years ago when I was in Paralegal school. One of my first depositions was of a “rape victim” who came to her video-taped deposition, where the defense was deposing her about her accusations of rape (which were obviously false to any idiot who read her story, except the FEMALE assistant DA I was interning with).
Long story short, she showed up in a skirt with a black T-shirt with red lips and lettering saying “EAT ME” and the lips had a tongue coming out.
Even before the depo began while the “victim” was sitting there, the DA offered the falsely accused a “nuisance plea” for “disorderly conduct”, just to close the file. She should have dismissed the case completely, but she was a feminist, so the guy took the plea, paid a fine, and that was it.
As you said “Treat her like a lady, but she is going to pose like a slut.”.
Any idea how many of those types I have seen on ChristianCafe website over last year or so? For fun, check out the “Christian” girls from California on CC site, pictures only search. Hoochie-mammas galore! LOL 🙄
I prefer the word trollop, since they don’t realize it’s an insult.
Do we need any more evidence that feminism…especially the promiscuity based feminism…leads to idolatry?
Every red blooded Christian man here should be staunchly against feminism.
Glamour has a treasure trove of divorce stories–one about a woman who stopped cooking because she didn’t find it fulfilling; one about how divorcees should have a registry for people to give them stuff; one about how a divorcee gained 60 lbs and now feels sooooo sexy:
https://www.glamour.com/divorce
@BillyS
We should learn by now that women will complain when they reap what they sow (in that regard).
I’ve recently been using that word more often for such forums as these or the alternate reality that is Twitter. Some of those women who on the surface appear to be anti-feminist on there also proclaim they want to be helpmates to their husband. I think words like that are important to see how a woman reacts to them. If she enjoys being called a helpmate…she’s on the right course. If she gets mad and wants to be an ‘equal partner’…leave her to the independence and cats.
This is certainly how millennial divorces go….
‘Your Marriage Is Over—Who Gets Custody of the Pets?’
How about Dit? (disked in tandem)
Darned autocorrect….Dicked in tandem
What the hell is a purity ring?
“‘Your Marriage Is Over—Who Gets Custody of the Pets?’
Give each person half a pet.
Now do PAWG.
“The yahoo police keep deleting all my comments on their stories whenever I use the term ‘home-wrecker.’”
Use “Zoe Quinn” in its place.
heresolong
What the hell is a purity ring?
Small electronic pop band from Edmonton, Canada. Obviously.
Also this: https://infogalactic.com/info/Purity_ring
Miley Cyrus used to wear one. If that’s not an endorsement, what is?
PS: Here is a site where you can learn many things. Consider using it sometime.
https://duckduckgo.com
Have a nice day.
“slut” and “whore” are insults thrown at women by women. Often, men see them as opportunities…
Here is an article about several 3rd stage “sex positive” feminists from the left-wing Guardian. Images safe for work. Note the body language of the various women, some of them are posed rather like comic book heroines.
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/nov/25/the-pleasure-revolution-what-women-really-want-sex
Here is another 3rd stage feminist and her quest to close yet another “gap”.
https://womenintheworld.com/2018/09/12/founder-of-award-winning-sex-tech-company-shares-grand-vision-to-close-the-orgasm-gap/
There’s a lot of fluff in these two articles, but the underlying mindsets / attitudes are worth bearing in mind, because such assumptions and premises cana become mainstream in a few years.
Ah the old nose piercing and unnatural hair color red flags. I pretty much assume any woman who has these are proud fornicators at this point.
THOT has the connotation of a woman who appears to be a whore, but is not necessarily a whore. The phrase “over there” suggests that she is being judged on her appearance and public behavior, rather than her bedroom practices.
The practical consequence of this distinction is that calling a woman a whore is potential slander, unless you have some actual knowledge of her sexual practices. But you can call a woman a THOT based on her appearance and outward behavior.
Red Pill Latecomer says:
November 29, 2018 at 7:02 pm
Yet another cat lady, age 50, laments never getting married. On the Dennis Prager Show: https://www.dennisprager.com/a-message-to-young-women-from-a-career-woman/
That read was a gem RPL! I had to share it!
Pingback: The smirk is the defense. | Dalrock
BillyS says:
November 29, 2018 at 11:58 pm
I just looked at a profile on a dating site. This woman was griping about all the men hitting her up for sex, yet most of her pics are showing significant cleavage, one in front of a bed. She failed to see the idiocy.
Treat her like a lady, but she is going to pose like a slut.
God laughs at men who deplore the effects of the causes that they cherish”. Bossuet
Glamour has a treasure trove of divorce stories…
https://www.glamour.com/story/divorced-women-on-how-they-spent-their-first-single-night
For these divorced women, the first single night is an orgasmic rush of pure pleasure after finally getting rid of the dreary old ball and chain who’s been holding them back all these years/months. The divorce night is almost as enjoyable as their wedding night.
But as Dalrock explains, this is all part of the new feminist inspired life cycle. Women are encouraged to get one divorce for the drama and feelz and sense of newfound freedom (and alimony, and house, and child support). But to be a success in this model, they have to get married again and stay married. The second divorce would bring not a sense of pleasurable freedom, but a sense of despair and failure.
Yet it would be hard to avoid the second divorce because she will still be just as picky and demanding, whatever she claims.
constraindelocus said-Reynolds was referring to preliminary research by Dr. Sarah Perman of the University of Colorado School of Medicine that, “Some bystanders may avoid performing CPR on women because they fear hurting them, or even being accused of sexual assault.”
I know a paramedic who was dating this Dr. and they came across a crash in Colorado and he wanted to stop. She told him no as he and she could be on the hook for their medical costs. This happens even in states with a “Good Samaritan Act”. They have it in Canada and you are not liable unless you intentionally do anything to make the injured party worse. You are not responsible for their medical expenses. Unfortunately the ridiculous medical costs in the U.S. and people who don’t appreciate your help and will sue you makes not intervening the right choice.
Out of seeming nowhere it just popped into my head: “You’re nothing but a cunt.”
Wow, where did that word come from? I don’t think I’d really heard that used since high school decades ago. There was zero thought to it; it was all reactionary to her repeated disgusting behavior.
Sure, there is much background to using THAT word, having previously identified her as a ‘witch’ [incredible rebellion …‘is as the sin of witchcraft’], and ‘bitch’ [ongoing scoffing to drive any man to the wilderness], adulterous [“Go have sex with someone else” she said], murder in the heart [threatened me with knives, and “I know where the guns are; women can kill, too, you know!”], liar [too many to comment here], deny Christ [“Don’t read me scripture”], and on…
…you know, what many men go through…
And then it just happened: BOOM …”You’re nothing but a cunt.” Dang, that nailed it …perfectly …I subconsciously knew the meaning, and never had the reason to use it as an adult …until then.
Comically, she responded to me a couple days later and said something like ‘I had to look that up and …and …you are despicable.’ I think she proudly went around telling people what I called her, to garner more sympathy for her marriage to such a wretched man.
@Jack Russell
No, you are wrong, this is not about “medical costs”. This is about being SUED by the injured victim and/or his estate (family members) if you perform a rescue that is not perfect and medically approved…. even though you may just be a construction worker or a lawyer or an architect and have zero medical knowledge.
California has a “Good Samaritan Law” (GSL) and activist judges, on behest of leftwing trial lawyers, “threw out” the GSL and allowed the guy who was rescued to sue his rescuers.
This is a well-known case studied in law schools today out of California, America’s 3rd world embarrassment of a “State”.
Bottom line: get involved, have a $5 million Dollar Umbrella policy, because you will almost certainly be sued. Or arrested. I personally worked on an insurance defense case where guy helped a woman out of a burning car crash and she now needed hip surgery and my friend was named as a defendant. Do not get involved is the new rule.
See:
Calif. Court: Would-be Good Samaritan can be sued (2008)
By PAUL ELIAS, Associated Press Writer Paul Elias, Associated Press Writer Thu Dec 18, 6:22 pm ET
LOS ANGELES – Proving that no good deed goes unpunished, the state’s high court on Thursday said a would-be Good Samaritan accused of rendering her friend paraplegic by pulling her from a wrecked car “like a rag doll” can be sued.
California’s Supreme Court ruled that the state’s Good Samaritan law only protects people from liability if the are administering emergency medical care, and that Lisa Torti’s attempted rescue of her friend didn’t qualify.
Justice Carlos Moreno wrote for a unanimous court that a person is not obligated to come to someone’s aid.
“If, however, a person elects to come to someone’s aid, he or she has a duty to exercise due care,” he wrote.
Torti had argued that she should still be protected from a lawsuit because she was giving “medical care” when she pulled her friend from a car wreck.
Alexandra Van Horn was in the front passenger seat of a car that slammed into a light pole at 45 mph on Nov. 1, 2004, according to her negligence lawsuit.
Torti was a passenger in a car that was following behind the vehicle and stopped after the crash. Torti said when she came across the wreck she feared the car was going to explode and pulled Van Horn out. Van Horn testified that Torti pulled her out of the wreckage “like a rag doll.” Van Horn blamed her friend for her paralysis.
Whether Torti is ultimately liable is still to be determined, but Van Horn’s lawsuit can go forward, the Supreme Court ruled.
Beverly Hills lawyer Robert Hutchinson, who represented Van Horn, said he’s pleased with the ruling.
Torti’s attorney, Ronald Kent, of Los Angeles didn’t immediately return a telephone call.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081218/ap_on_re_us/samaritan_protection
Video: http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?cl=11186852
@ earl says: This is certainly how millennial divorces go…. ‘Your Marriage Is Over—Who Gets Custody of the Pets?’
Seems like a joke to most, but it is a real thing. I have seen a wife spend a good $10 grand on a “pet custody” fights. They now have a shared custody agreement and scheduled time with the family dog.
We also now have to worry about losers that cannot go buy a tube of SuperGlue at Home Depot without bringing their dog with them (while there is nothing physically or mentally wrong with them… MEDICALLY-speaking, that is). 😀 Then they get into a car crash and Fido flies out the windshield… since, well, dogs do not wear seatbelts. Next stop is not the pet cemetery, it is a PI attorney to sue the other driver for their anguish, pain and suffering, etc etc. There is special inusrance endorsements to deal with pets in cars now. 🙄
I am NOT kidding on either case.
@Nick Mgtow says: Yet another cat lady, age 50, laments never getting married. On the Dennis Prager Show: https://www.dennisprager.com/a-message-to-young-women-from-a-career-woman/
It took her until age 50 (fifty) to realize it and finally regret it?!?! 🙄 So clueless…. she is hopeless to a point beyond what human pity can be sincerely bestow on her.
@ CSI
According to PUA Donovan Sharpe over at RoK, “there is nothing that gets a woman wetter and in a bigger hurry to jump in bed with multiple random guys faster then a final divorce decree paper issued by the Courts”.
I am not sure why she is even waiting. :shrug: She can openly have an affair during the marriage and during the divorce and make zero difference in the divorce procedure or outcome. Probably she will get a high-5 from the feminist Family Court judge, since she is, thanks to the openness of her cuckolding a dude, making her a “strong, powerful, independent woman”.
Thanks no-fault divorce laws! -_-
Pingback: Encouraging courageous women. – Adam Piggott
I think she proudly went around telling people what I called her, to garner more sympathy for her marriage to such a wretched man.
It’s more likely that she, like most Western women today, is so mentally and spitritually ill (terminally so, in fact) that she actually takes pride in wearing labels that throughout the rest of human history have been used to mark specific women as sub-human outcasts.
I don’t think most people realize just how completely Satan has subjugated the Western female – and how delighted she is to be held in his dark bondage.
Give the penchent for women to be ‘dog moms’ and get out of actual children it wouldn’t surprise me they’d spend that much for custody of a dumb animal.
Thanks for the clarification Christian McCool. I travel to Washington state quite a few times a year. If I ever come across and incident that need medical intervention. I will pass, even though I am qualified as a Paramedic and am working on my search and rescue and wilderness rescue.
ChristianCool says:
December 1, 2018 at 3:25 am
[…]
California has a “Good Samaritan Law” (GSL) and activist judges, on behest of leftwing trial lawyers, “threw out” the GSL and allowed the guy who was rescued to sue his rescuers.
This is a well-known case studied in law schools today out of California, America’s 3rd world embarrassment of a “State”.
Bottom line: get involved, have a $5 million Dollar Umbrella policy, because you will almost certainly be sued. Or arrested. I personally worked on an insurance defense case where guy helped a woman out of a burning car crash and she now needed hip surgery and my friend was named as a defendant.
Do not get involved is the new rule.
So, anything that men used to do, jump in a building in flames, court and marry women, be a father to their child, is now an act that can get you in troubles financially or legally?
Looks like an incentive to stand by and do nothing, as they do in China.
If you really want some hardcore information on thots come on down to my blog at: https://banishallthethots.wordpress.com/ please note that all this information is intended for humor purposes only and is not meant to be taking seriously. Just had to put that out there before i got bombarded with hate. Thank you pls look at my site. p.s.. I Love you all.